How do you reply after reviewing a document?
Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewersRule 1: Provide an overview, then quote the full set of reviews.Rule 2: Be polite and respectful of all reviewers.Rule 3: Accept the blame.Rule 4: Make the response self-contained.Rule 5: Respond to every point raised by the reviewer.Rule 6: Use typography to help the reviewer navigate your response.
How long does it take to review an article?
The time it takes for a journal to get the review process completed varies across journals and fields. While some take a month or two, others can take up to 6 months or more. As you have correctly observed, Statistics/Mathematics journals usually take a longer time, and may at times, take even up to a year to complete.
How do you handle reviewer comments?
7 tips for dealing with reviewer commentsUse the reviewer comments even if your paper is rejected. Be polite but not over-polite. Don’t feel obliged to accept everything the reviewer says. What to do when two reviewers ask for opposite things. Make sure you address everything. Dealing with comments you don’t understand. Engage the editor as an adjudicator.
How do you respond to a decision letter?
Put your answer after each individual comment. Refer to text where changes have been made. Don’t refer to page numbers, but use line numbers or cite the start of the sentence in the particular section. Clearly explain any suggestions you disagree with and why (and give evidence to show this).
How do you deal with rejection paper?
Take Your Pulse.Reading the Rejection Letter.Following the Author Instructions.Matching Paper to Journal.Obtaining Additional Data or Reanalyzing Existing Data.Resubmitting to the Same Journal.Resubmitting to a New Journal.Bottom Line.
Is revise and resubmit good?
When submitting your writing for publication in a journal, the best you can often hope for is to receive a “revise and resubmit” request from the editor. While there is no guarantee that the journal will accept the article after revisions, your odds are certainly better than if they rejected you!
Can a paper get rejected after a major revision?
You have received one recommendation for major and one for minor revisions. If you address the reviewers’ concerns satisfactorily, your paper stands a fair chance of getting accepted. However, as the editor has mentioned, you need to consider the reviewer comments very carefully, and provide point-by-point responses.
Why do papers get rejected?
The reasons for a paper being rejected once it has been reviewed fall mainly into two categories: (1) problems with the research; and (2) problems with the writing/presentation of the paper. A paper may be rejected because of problems with the research on which it is based.
How long should a revise and resubmit take?
about 11 weeks
How long does it take for peer review process?
The peer review process starts when the suitable reviewers accept the journal’s invitation to review. Depending on the specific subject area of your study and the availability of the reviewers, this process may take few days to start. Sometimes, this period may extend to 2-3 weeks.
Can you resubmit a rejected paper?
The journal may reject your initial offering but invite you to resubmit later after addressing the reviewers’ concerns. Remember that some journals will inform you that they are not interested in accepting any future versions of the manuscript; you should respect this decision and try a different journal.
How long do journals take to review papers?
What is the difference between in review and under review?
One possible reason for the change could be that “under review” indicates that the reviewer has accepted the invitation to review and “in review” means that the review process has actually started.
Why does peer review take so long?
Reviewers will always be given a timeframe in which to return their review, how long they are given depends on the journal and the subject area. However long the reviewer is given, there is very little the journal can do to ensure that they stick to the deadline, other than to send them reminders.
What does under review mean Journal?
For most journals, the status “under review” is used to indicate that the paper has cleared the editorial check and has been sent for external review. If there is no change for more than a few weeks, politely write to the journal editor asking about the status of your submission.
Can application under review meaning rejected?
If your application makes it this far than it would most likely be labeled “under review” and the next step from here is either to receive an email regarding the interview, or a rejection email. Overall – being under review does not mean something positive or negative. It is a neutral sign.
What is the main purpose of the article under review?
A review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic. A review article surveys and summarizes previously published studies, rather than reporting new facts or analysis. Review articles are sometimes also called survey articles or, in news publishing, overview articles.
What does decision in process mean?
When a journal displays the “decision in process” status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. There’s no specific time frame for this; the time may vary depending on the journal and the field.
Does decision in process mean rejection?
Answer: ‘Decision in Process’ on the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) means that the editor has logged a decision in the system but is awaiting confirmation from the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). A ‘Decision in Process’ soon after submission typically indicates that the manuscript is being desk-rejected.
How long does decision in process take?
Most journals normally take 4-8 weeks to review manuscripts. The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. In this step, the editor carefully evaluates all the comments by the peer-reviewers and examines the manuscript.